Transportation groups fear plans for infrastructure might dead-end
The Hill
by Kevin Bogardus
Transportation groups have much to like in President Obama’s budget request for infrastructure improvements but fear the spending plan might not get off the ground in Congress.
In his budget proposal, released Monday, the president laid out a six-year, $556 billion surface reauthorization plan that would provide funding for the nation’s roads, ports and bridges.
In order to jumpstart infrastructure improvements, the plan is front-loaded with $50 billion in funding for fiscal 2012.
The plan has won plaudits from transportation advocates who have long been waiting for the White House to act on the president’s words of support for infrastructure improvements.
“We think there needs to be movement on a six-year reauthorization bill,†said Brian Deery, senior director of the highway and transportation division at the Associated General Contractors of America. “We think the president has made a good first start on restarting that debate with this budget proposal. We need to get serious about the reauthorization.â€
But while big on funding, the plan does not specify how it will be paid for. That omission has not gone unnoticed among those lobbying for more government funds.
“That is the big banana here: How are you going to pay for it?†Deery said. “Coming up with a big spending program is easy. How [you are] going to pay for it is more difficult.â€
During the last Congress, the Obama administration helped stall movement on a similar transportation plan by then-House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Jim Oberstar (D-Minn.). The White House nixed talk of raising the gas tax to help pay for new federal transportation spending, citing concerns over the struggling economy.
But since Labor Day, Obama has become more vocal about his support for rebuilding infrastructure, making it a key theme in his State of the Union address. And while a Republican-led House is eyeing every federal program for spending cuts, the administration’s budget proposal shows that it believes infrastructure should remain untouched.
The transportation lobby has long supported many of the other items in Obama’s 2012 budget request. Under the proposal, for example, the government would continue to invest in modernization of the air traffic control system and spend $53 billion over six years on high-speed rail. The government would also make a $30 billion down payment on a new national infrastructure bank.
“The money is right,†said Jack Basso, director of program finance and management for the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
But lobbyists see trouble for all of the proposals on Capitol Hill. A gas tax increase would likely face opposition from both parties, though it could serve as a short-term fix for the plan’s funding problem.
“The gas tax is probably the quickest and most efficient way you could raise revenue,†Basso said.
Support for more infrastructure spending cuts across traditional rivalries of business and labor in Washington. U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Tom Donohue and AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka will testify before Congress on Wednesday in support of government funding for roads and highways.
The Chamber has even lent its weight to a gas-tax increase to help fund those improvements.
Unions will also likely mobilize behind the Obama transportation plan.
“We think this is a sign that he does really get it,†said David Miller, a spokesman for the Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA), an AFL-CIO member. “This is the exact kind of investment that is needed to get people working again and make some desperately needed repairs to our crumbling roads and bridges.â€
Miller said his union’s members would aggressively lobby for infrastructure spending this year. LIUNA also is not opposed to any financing plan to pay for the plan.
“Our take on this is this is a crisis. We think every option should be on the table, whether that’s tolls, an infrastructure bank, and yes, a gas-tax increase,†said Miller of LIUNA. “We are not wedded to any particular financing plan for this.â€
But several lobbyists said the White House should have stated more clearly in its budget proposal how to pay for the infrastructure plan. John Cline, a partner at the c2 Group who lobbies for several major transit systems, like Los Angeles and Houston, said Washington is waiting for someone else to decide how to pay for new transportation spending.
“Somebody needs to lead on this issue. I feel that everyone is looking over their shoulder at everyone else,†Cline said.
To view original story http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/144351-transportation-groups-fear-plans-for-infrastructure-may-dead-end
Return to TopC2 Group Joins FTI Consulting
FTI Consulting - Mar 19, 2013
FTI Acquires C2 Group
PR Week - Mar 19, 2013
K Street Files: FTI Consulting Snaps Up C2 Group
Roll Call - Mar 19, 2013
Boutique Lobby Shop C2 Group Acquired by FTI Consulting
The Washington Post - Mar 19, 2013
Blue Dogs try fresh approach
Politico - Mar 22, 2012
Forest Service releases wish list for new firefighting planes
Denver Post - Feb 15, 2012
On the Move
CQ Weekly - Jan 16, 2012
Los Angeles Leads Full-Throttle Dash for U.S. Transit Cash
The New York Times - Jun 06, 2011
Highway Money Fight Shifts to States
Roll Call - May 24, 2011
Former Seneca exec is D.C. consultant
Buffalo Law Journal - Mar 03, 2011
Ex-Seneca Gaming exec adds D.C. work
Buffalo Business First - Mar 01, 2011
Barry Brandon and Galen Reser Join the Partners of C2 GROUP
Press Release - Feb 21, 2011
Transportation groups fear plans for infrastructure might dead-end
The Hill - Feb 16, 2011
Light rail expansion on the line
Houston Chronicle - Jan 31, 2011
Blue Dogs on K Street Say Their Clout Stays
Roll Call - Nov 09, 2010
K Streeters Launch Blue Dog Nonprofit
Roll Call Staff - Apr 13, 2010
Lobbyists Ice Members in Hockey Fundraiser
Roll Call Staff - Mar 11, 2010
Higgins: Hill Tougher Than Hockey (VIDEO)
Politico Click - Mar 10, 2010
K Street Files: Ice Ice Baby
Roll Call Staff - Mar 03, 2010
C2 GROUP Makes Top 50 Lobbying Firms 2009
Influence 50 - Jan 29, 2010
Porsche, other car companies lobby to ease new fuel efficiency standards
The Hill - Dec 18, 2009
Big Builders Erect New Trade Association
Roll Call Staff - Dec 07, 2009
New Leadership at NFIB Makes a Return to Roots
Roll Call Staff - Nov 30, 2009
Firms Offer Tasty Morsels to Blue Dogs’ Top Aides
Roll Call Staff - Sep 16, 2009
Flexible Spending Account Providers Fighting to Protect Benefits
Roll Call Staff - Aug 03, 2009
K Street Files: Checking In
Roll Call Staff - Jul 28, 2009
Rockefeller’s Robertson Joins c2group, LLC
Press Release - Mar 27, 2009
K Street Discovers a New Star
Roll Call Staff - Mar 25, 2009
NRA Hits the Legislative Trail With Guns Blazing
Roll Call Staff - Mar 20, 2009
K Street Files: Powering Up
Roll Call Staff - Mar 18, 2009
Inaugural Parties, Lobbyists’ Havens
Roll Call Staff - Jan 07, 2009
Lobbyist for Big Builders Says Tax Carry-Back Not Dead
BuilderOnline.com - Jul 08, 2008
NAHB sees relief in tax credit
Politico - May 01, 2008
K Street Remains an Easy Street in Hard Times
CQ WEEKLY - Apr 21, 2008
Lobbying firm C2 Group acquires Bates Capitol Group
bizjournals.com - Jul 31, 2007
THE C2 GROUP LAUNCHES INTO THE TOP 20 OF INDEPENDENT LOBBYING FIRMS THROUGH MERGER WITH BATES GROUP,
Press Release - Jul 30, 2007
C2 Gets a ‘B’
Roll Call Staff - Jul 30, 2007
Blue Dog Lobbyists: Now With Bite
Roll Call Staff - Jan 22, 2007
Corporate Road Warriors on the Move
Washington Post - Jun 19, 2006